Schuh-Werk2024
Proposition:
A healthy and painfree body is able to move without limit!
Derivation 1:
Handikaps, Blockages and pain restrict normal movement, no matter on which level of the body.
Derivation 2:
Shoes and/or insoles of any kind, have positive or negative effects to the mobillity of the body.
Conclusion:
When „manipulations“ at/under the feet are set, you can proof the changes of static, if they are clearly
masurable in the top-joint(altlas-skull base).
More accurate:
Everything whats „happens“ at/under the feet, actes through the biomechanical systems(skeleton, joints,
muscles and fascia) from the bottom to the top.
See: Tom Meyr´s Anatomie Trains, et all.
Measurements:
1. Mensuration: barefoot. >>returns the basic value!
2. Mensuration: with insoles, shoes,….
•
Rating:
•
If the head-rotation is better than „barefoot“, the maipulation has authorisation.
•
If the haed-rotation is worse, it can be assumed, that the manipulation causes blockages.
For the proof, whether this results could be positive or negative, you find with HMSU a simple and yet
widely devise.
Get the impact of shoes, heel-hights, insoles, ortheses, portheses, till to sock and stockings for the well-
bing of your patients/customers.
2018: Impact of insoles with individual sensoric feedback to
the kranio-cervikale mobillity while standing and the roll motion from feet while
walking.
Dietmar Basta, Wolfgang P. Schallmey , Arneborg Ernst
6/2018: Studie bySabine Bayr with HMSU support:
More head mobility (lateral rotation) & muscl relaxation by herbal eyedrops
7/2017: Puplication: OT,
Haedrotation as a basis for measurement, to demonstrate the effect of insoles.
Application
Study presentation at the OST Congress2023
Schuh-Werk 2024
application
Proposition:
A healthy and pain free body is able to move without
limit!
Derivation 1:
Handikaps, blockages and pain restrict normal
movement, no matter which level of the body.
Derivation 2:
Shoes and/or insoles of any kind, have positive or
negative effect to the mobillity of the body.
Conclusion:
When „manipulations“ at/under the feet are set, you
can proof changes of static, if they are clearly
masurable in the top-joint(altlas-skull base).
More accurate:
Everything whats „happens“ at/under the feet, actes
through the biomechanical systems(skeleton, joints,
muscles and fascia) from the bottom to the top.
See: Tom Meyr´s Anatomie Trains, et all.
Measurements:
1. Mensuration: barefoot. >>returns the basic value!
2. Mensuration: with insoles, shoes,….
•
Rating:
•
If head-rotation is better than „barefoot“, the
maipulation has authorisation.
•
If haed-rotation is worse, it can be assumed, that
the placed manipulation causes blockages
For the proof, whether this results could be positive or
negative, you find with HMSU a simple and yet widely
devise.
Get the impact of shoes, heel-hights, insoles, ortheses,
portheses, till to sock and stockings for the well being
of your patients/customers.
2018: Impact of insoles with individual sensoric feedback to
the kranio-cervikale mobillity while standing and the
roll motion from feet while walking.
Dietmar Basta, Wolfgang P. Schallmey , Arneborg Ernst
7/2017: Puplication: OT,
Haedrotation as a basis for
measurement, to demonstrate the
effect of insoles.
6/2018: Studie by Sabine Bayr with HMSU support:
More head mobility (lateral rotation)
& muscl relaxation by herbal
eyedrops
Study presentation at the OST Congress2023
